Home>Entertainment>Dan Dakich’s Solution To Court-Storming Issue: Increased Police Presence And Big Fines
Entertainment
Dan Dakich’s Solution To Court-Storming Issue: Increased Police Presence And Big Fines
Published: February 28, 2024
Discover Dan Dakich's solution to the court-storming issue, involving increased police presence and hefty fines. Stay updated with the latest news on this topic.
(Many of the links in this article redirect to a specific reviewed product. Your purchase of these products through affiliate links helps to generate commission for Splashnewsonline.com, at no extra cost. Learn more)
Table of Contents
Former Hoosiers star, Dan Dakich, has weighed in on the ongoing debate surrounding court-storming in college basketball. In response to recent incidents, including the injury of Kyle Filipowski, Dakich has proposed a straightforward solution to the problem.
Key Takeaway
Dan Dakich proposes a two-pronged approach to address the issue of court-storming in college basketball, emphasizing the need for enhanced police presence and the implementation of substantial fines as deterrents to ensure the safety of all individuals involved.
Beefed-Up Police Presence
Dakich suggests that schools should increase police presence on nights where court-storming is likely to occur. He emphasizes the need for visible law enforcement, stating that surrounding the losing team with a strong police presence would effectively deter fans from rushing the court.
Hefty Fines as a Deterrent
In addition to bolstering security, Dakich advocates for imposing significant fines on schools that fail to prevent court-storming or handle the situation appropriately. He believes that imposing substantial financial penalties would incentivize schools to take proactive measures to ensure the safety of players, staff, and fans during post-game celebrations.
These measures, according to Dakich, would allow students to celebrate their universities’ achievements while prioritizing safety. He emphasizes the importance of striking a balance between preserving the tradition of court-storming and safeguarding the well-being of individuals involved.