Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce’s Sydney Zoo Date Draws Criticism From PETA

(Many of the links in this article redirect to a specific reviewed product. Your purchase of these products through affiliate links helps to generate commission for Splashnewsonline.com, at no extra cost. Learn more)

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s recent visit to a Sydney zoo has sparked controversy, with PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) expressing disapproval of their choice of outing. The celebrity couple’s excursion to the zoo has drawn attention from animal rights activists, particularly in light of their interactions with the wildlife during the visit.

PETA’s Stance

Debbie Metzler, PETA Foundation Director of Captive Animal Welfare, voiced PETA’s concerns, emphasizing the importance of considering the treatment of animals in such environments. Metzler referenced Taylor Swift’s own song, stating, “While we understand all too well the appeal of seeing Australia’s wildlife, PETA hopes that next time Taylor and Travis want to see wild animals, they’ll spend their time and money at a true sanctuary.”

PETA advocates for the patronage of animal sanctuaries, where visitors are not permitted to feed or touch the animals, and are required to maintain a respectful distance from them. In contrast, the zoo reportedly allows for hands-on interactions with the wildlife, a practice that PETA opposes.

Controversial Interactions

During their visit, Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce were seen engaging in activities that PETA discourages, such as feeding a kangaroo. The couple appeared to thoroughly enjoy the various animal exhibitions at the zoo, with Taylor having reportedly scoped out the location a day prior to their visit.

PETA’s Message

PETA’s response to the celebrity couple’s zoo visit reflects their ongoing commitment to advocating for ethical treatment of animals. The organization is known for speaking out against perceived mistreatment of animals by public figures, and in this instance, they have urged Taylor and Travis to consider alternative options for wildlife experiences in the future.